some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. others argue that it is better to try and improve such a situation.
It is often argued that accept any bad situations for their best even if it does not appeal to you at all. I completely disagree with this opinion and think that they must learn to overcome such situations.
First of all, unsatisfactory job experience and shortage of money are worse than any kind of situation people have to face. If people happen to have a hard time around working period or money shortage in their life, they cannot focus on their own life or goals and also will be led to bad health conditions. For example, when I was working as an intern, I got all kind of works in an office including buying coffee, passing letters throughout the building, etc. at that time I couldn’t be able to focus my studies and had to drop out from university. Because of that, I had to take counselling for two years and It impacted my career life. That’s why people must try to improve such situations for their best.
Secondly, people should try to learn things from any kind of situations to move on. In other words, after an unsatisfied experience or situation in their career life, they can learn how to deal with such kind of situation to get better results in future. For example, famous researchers are always trying to learn things from their experiment attempts although they have to try uncountable times. That’s why they are improving their knowledge as well as rapid innovation of the world. Thus, improving bad situations in people’s life outweigh the drawback of accepted any bad situation in a long-term perspective.
To conclude, I strongly believe people should try to overcome any bad situations because it makes them happy and motivated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-09 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
| 2024-01-23 | hau le | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 56 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 56 | view |
- More people put their personal information online e q address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes is this positive or negative development 56
- The charts below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 67
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 84
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money others argue that it is better to try and improve such a situation 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 469, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...oughout the building etc at that time I couldnt be able to focus my studies and had to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 628, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...wo years and It impacted my career life Thats why people must try to improve such sit...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...ough they have to try uncountable times Thats why they are improving their knowledge ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecause it makes them happy and motivated
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, kind of, as well as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65972222222 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53104756468 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 288.0 20.2975951904 1419% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1342.0 106.682146367 1258% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 288.0 20.7667163134 1387% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 113.0 7.06120827912 1600% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395960681902 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.395960681902 0.084324248473 470% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241018414273 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374279462428 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 144.5 13.0946893788 1104% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -212.38 50.2224549098 -423% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 114.4 11.3001002004 1012% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.23 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 20.77 8.58950901804 242% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 9.78957915832 541% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 117.2 10.1190380762 1158% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 53.0 10.7795591182 492% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.