Provided is a chart comparing the unemployed Australian percentage between rural and urban area in 2012.
It is evident that throughout the whole period, proportion in countryside area was generally decreasing, while that in city region appeared a rising trend.
Going into more detail, at the beginning of the year, unemployment ratio among rural area had steadily decreased for six months, from 6.5% to 4.5%. That was the lowest record in the whole period. Then a mild fluctuation was recorded around 5% in the next half year.
In contrast, a mere 2.2% of Australians in urban area were unemployed at first. However, the figure fluctuated wildly until the third quarter of the year. It almost doubled to 4% and dropped to nearly 2% again. After September, it appeared a gradual elevation and reached the top at around 5% at the end of 2012.
In summary, despite the obvious difference between two rate at first, it was significantly reduced at the end of the period.
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons there relevant 78
- The chart below gives information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land What solution is better 92
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing what do you think are the causes of problems and what measures could be tackled to solve them 89
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land What solution is better 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...ed around 5 in the next half year In contrast a mere 22 of Australians in urban area ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, then, third, while, in contrast, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 789.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81097560976 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71666015821 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603658536585 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 164.0 22.4926829268 729% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 789.0 112.824112599 699% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 164.0 22.9334400587 715% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 63.0 5.23603664747 1203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144210897931 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144210897931 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824325711434 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780571280658 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 83.2 13.2329268293 629% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -86.52 61.2550243902 -141% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 66.1 10.3012195122 642% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.8 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.72 8.06136585366 195% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 11.4329268293 464% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 67.6 10.9970731707 615% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 53.0 11.0658536585 479% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.