Some people think that famous people's support towards international aids organisation draws attention to problems, while others think that celebrities make the problems less important. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Twenty-first century has been notoriously popular as the age of FAME. Indeed, association of elite personalities with any benefaction or social services can make a huge difference. Although some believe this has more of a negative impact, my belief is that the process allows to garner much more attention to the particular issue.
The argument against the indulgence of celebrities in aids organisations can be supported in terms of the risk that their fame may overshadow the essence of actual issue. People nowadays prefer to be engrossed in lives of eminent personalities more than nothing else. As a result presence of stars in the arena, for instance, might change the whole scenario into mere a platform for them to meet their idols. If charity programmes were not associated with the celebrities, people attending the function would focus more on the issue, and therefore the actual purpose could be met.
Despite aforementioned concerns, there are certainly several benefits to collaboration of famous people with charity organisations. Firstly, this attributes advertisement of the issue over a wider geographical area. Perhaps, this is the best possible way to draw an attention of people extremely busy in their own matters. Next, smitten followers of the popular faces, in an attempt to emulate their idols, eventually get into the charity programmes. By a way of illustration, geriatric centres in my hometown has been successful to receive a substantial sum of donation once a bollywood television programme broadcasted the whole episode highlighting the plight of elderly people in such centres. Support from celebrities, hence, can entice more public eyes to the issue.
To sum, there are more benefits than detrimental effects from celebrities' indulgence in international aids institution. Perhaps, fame is one of the necessary evils of the era.
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this option. 70
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both these views and give your 80
- Almost everyone agrees that one should be training children to recycle waste to save the Earths natural resources. Some believe that it is parents who should teach their children to recycle waste. Others argue that school is the best place to teach this. 83
- Some people think that famous people's support towards international aids organisation draws attention to problems, while others think that celebrities make the problems less important. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 80
geriatric centres in my hometown has been successful
geriatric centres in my hometown have been successful
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 293 350
No. of Characters: 1536 1500
No. of Different Words: 176 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.137 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.242 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.046 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 113 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 93 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 64 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 48 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.533 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.615 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.333 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.311 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.516 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.039 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5