In many cities there is a lack of space to develop and as a result in order to modernize old buildings are demolished and replaced with new buildings What are the disadvantages of knocking down old buildings Do advantages out weigh disadvantages

Essay topics:

In many cities, there is a lack of space to develop and as a result, in order to modernize, old buildings are demolished and replaced with new buildings. What are the disadvantages of knocking down old buildings? Do advantages out-weigh disadvantages?

With the aim of developing, modernizing and resolving space shortage problem, many cities knock down former constructions and alter with the modern ones. It is believed that demolishing old buildings has its own advantages and disadvantages, but I think the plus point outweigh the minus point.
On the one hand, it can be said that pulling down old buildings to construct news buildings has some noteworthy drawbacks. Firstly, there is a negative impact on environment and also people’s lives. It is because the areas near those building sites will be affected by the construction dust. Hence, air pollution will rise and people will suffer from respiratory problem. Secondly, to ensure the safety for the workforce building sites are widened, as a result parts of roads will be occupied. Consequently, this will lead to traffic jam and rise the pressure on traffic.
On the other hand, despite the aforementioned downsides, there are some upsides should be taken into consideration. The main advantage is that there would be a solution to the shortage of spaces. With the growth of construction industry, we can build up much higher buildings with more floors. As a result, demand for space will decrease, which will resolve booming population and also help develop many others aspects. Another benefit is that new buildings will help reduce the occurrence rate of breakdowns. It is due to the fact that such buildings are equipped with modern appliances and facilities such as automatic fire alarm, sprinkle system, etc. so that people can conveniently get rid of emergency situations and handle small problems.
In conclusion, although demolishing old buildings to replace with the new ones may bring some downsides that negatively affect to our lives, the upsides are positively efficiency for long-running development. In my opinion, there should be solutions to the drawbacks such as building net around the sites to avoid dust and so on.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-04-05 hellpo 56 view
2023-04-05 hellpo 89 view
2023-04-05 hellpo 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 559, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fic jam and rise the pressure on traffic On the other hand despite the aforementi...
^^^
Line 3, column 732, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ncy situations and handle small problems In conclusion although demolishing old b...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, may, second, secondly, so, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0923566879 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78850891678 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566878980892 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 314.0 20.2975951904 1547% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1599.0 106.682146367 1499% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 314.0 20.7667163134 1512% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 153.0 7.06120827912 2167% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358712124598 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.358712124598 0.084324248473 425% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239280885234 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846562266338 0.056905535591 149% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 159.5 13.0946893788 1218% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -247.23 50.2224549098 -492% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 125.8 11.3001002004 1113% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.72 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 23.54 8.58950901804 274% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 9.78957915832 592% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 127.6 10.1190380762 1261% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 126.0 10.7795591182 1169% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.