In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals as food or other products such as medicines and clothing Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

In the modern world, it is no longer necessary to use animals as food or other products, such as medicines and clothing. Do you agree or disagree?

There has been an argument on the necessity of exploiting animals for food, medicines, and outfits over years. Some people consider the slaughter of animals to produce meat and other byproducts to be unnecessary. In my view, I totally agree with this idea and will address several compelling reasons in this essay.
Nowadays, many public health challenges confront us in multiple aspects about impaired health conditions, including cancer and heart disease caused by excessive consumption of meat Professional experts are appealing for a change in human diets so that people can get better wellness. Fortunately, a range of plant-based foods is available on the market to be a better choice for meat abstinence. In fact, vegetarian diets are being favored by growing numbers of people and can supplement the same amount of nutrients for consumers. In particular, mushrooms and tofu contain high levels of protein, a kind of nutrient presumably only found in meat, and can be used as a substitute.
Furthermore, medical experiments on animals and medicines manufactured from animals’ body parts received little endorsement in the past. These days, herbs and many other categories of plan-based medicines, such as ginseng, chamomile, can cure my diseases, prolong human life expectancy, and aid medical practitioners handle many ailments. More menacingly, countless wild animals, such as tigers and minks, are exterminated each year to satisfy the demand of the fashion industry for the fur trade of coats and accessories. There are now similar products made from plants and artificial materials that can fulfill human needs. Animals do not have to suffer for our needs anymore.
In conclusion, I think that our needs and desires do not justify the suffering of animals and animal products are no longer necessary. We can choose a different source of nourishment, medicine, and clothing without any toll on wild animals.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-15 hieu13092006 84 view
2022-12-08 tieuquynh 89 view
2021-10-22 mingchou265 84 view
2021-04-09 hakinguyen 84 view
2021-04-09 hakinguyen 84 view
Essays by user hakinguyen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 669, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in meat and can be used as a substitute Furthermore medical experiments on anima...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, well, i think, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, kind of, such as, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18421052632 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76397231106 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 304.0 20.2975951904 1498% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1576.0 106.682146367 1477% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 304.0 20.7667163134 1464% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 103.0 7.06120827912 1459% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229639510287 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.229639510287 0.084324248473 272% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146649475429 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908602680554 0.056905535591 160% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 155.0 13.0946893788 1184% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -245.54 50.2224549098 -489% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 123.0 11.3001002004 1088% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.24 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 23.44 8.58950901804 273% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 9.78957915832 582% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 123.6 10.1190380762 1221% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 124.0 10.7795591182 1150% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.