The bar chart illustrates the statistics of different aged people who donated money to charity during 1990 and 2010 in UK.
The bar chart illustrates the statistics of different aged people who donated money to charity during 1990 and 2010 in UK.
Overall, it is obvious that the level of donation done by British was higher among 18-50 aged people in 1990, however, in the following period the elderly citizens provided more charitable donations.
According to the data given in the chart, in 1990 the percentage of contributors at 36-50 had the highest point of about 42% while the number of people at the same age accounted for 35% exactly in 2010. The percentage of patrons at middle age was above 32% in the former period meanwhile it was estimated at nearly 25% in the following time.
The 18-25 year old supporters were the lowest point on the chart showing around 15 and 6 percent respectively in the given time. Yet, in 1990, contributors at 51-56 experienced a decline of nearly 9% while in the other year, it was under 40%. Afterwards, the number of the elderly people aged 65 and above was about 33% and this figure rose to 35% in 2010.
- The given diagram illustrates that amount of Southland s principal exports in 2000 2021 and future plans for 2025 73
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The figures illustrate the statistics about usage of water in Oceania in the year of 2004
- The chart below shows the result of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in 5 Australian cities 84
- The two types of figures table and pie chart illustrate four main reasons caused land degradation regionally and nationwide
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...36-50 had the highest point of about 42% while the number of people at the same a...
^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...est point on the chart showing around 15 and 6 percent respectively in the given ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68131868132 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52359951704 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1770025044 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.714285714 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372804098888 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.210505308873 0.103423049105 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.325271733021 0.0843802449381 385% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.334675449605 0.15604864568 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.384181943818 0.0819641961636 469% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.