In the future, nobody will buy newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Internet has revolutionized our lives in many ways, one of which is the instant access to news. Because of this, many people believe that newspapers and books will loose their relevance and will be replaced by the online alternatives. While I strongly believe that there will always be market for paper in the future, this essay will discuss both sides.
Looking at the currents trends, one could be forgiven to think that physical paper will quickly succumb to digital media. First reason being the huge convenience of online platforms. It has become so easy to access news updates or communicate with friends and family through the internet that nobody even thinks about buying news. When a smartphone can provide you with instant information, people stop waiting for their morning newspaper. Recent Galop survey showed that decline in newspapers circulation and smartphone ownership were directly related to each other. Secondly, online news is freely available, while newspapers are becoming more and more expensive. The bleak financial situation of the world lends itself to contributing towards boom of online media outlets. Since 2008 depression, half of the world newspapers have gone bankrupt while online media houses have seen major profits.
Even though the world seems to be moving towards a digital future, I believe that there will always be people who appreciate the experience of reading newspapers and books. A computer screen can’t actually replicate the enjoyment of reading a newspaper at breakfast. Even if digital world completely takes over, nostalgic people will still buy books and magazines just for the sake of feeling paper between their fingers. The peculiar smell inside an old book shop will always attract a niche class of society towards it. What’s happening to paper is very similar to all the other amenities of lives that have disappeared over time but never vanished. For instance Vinyl, people still buy them, even at expensive rates, just because of nostalgia.
In conclusion, although digitization has many conveniences, it won’t completely replace paper. In my opinion, there will always be small group of people who will prefer sentimental values over comfort.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-24 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nguyen Thinh | 56 | view |
| 2024-10-11 | bigbuu97 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-05 | Daniel3003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-28 | huynguyen3726 | 56 | view |
- The bar charts show how many local and international students were enrolled in the Bachelor of Science and Bachelor of Law courses at the Bond University between 2010 and 2012 73
- Behavior in schools is getting worse Explain the causes of this problem and suggest some possible solutions 84
- The graphs below show the number of enrolments into three higher education faculties in the UK 73
- The graph shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 73
- The charts below show total British exports and the countries that Britain exports to 52
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
... believe that newspapers and books will loose their relevance and will be replaced by...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1870.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32763532764 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60064495723 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598290598291 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.3154064967 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.4210526316 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4736842105 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78947368421 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244361613371 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732795237923 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618674033467 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154733415743 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468014091391 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.