The chart below shows the number of magazines sold per person in five countries in 2000and 2010, with the projected sales for 2020.
The bar chart compares five countries in terms of the number of magazines that are bought by a person in the period between 2000 and 2020.
Overall, it is clear that the quantity of magazines sold to a person in country E is forecasted to remain under 10 during the period shown. Additionally, while the figure is expected to decrease in countries A, B, and C, the opposite trend is anticipated in country D.
Turning into detail, in 2000, each citizen in country A and country B bought nearly 50 magazines. Nevertheless, over the twenty-year period, the two countries will witness a moderate decline in this figure, at 38 magazines and about 45 magazines per person respectively. Moreover, the similar tendency is predicted to happen in country D, where the number of magazines consumed by an individual reached approximately 37 in 2000 before felling to 32 in 2020.
Regards to the remaining categories, just about 8 magazines were read by a resident in country E in 2000 and this number is supposed to be unchanged in 2020 despite a slight rise in 2010. Meanwhile, the figure for country D is expected to go up from 19 in 2000 to about 24 in 2020.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-17 | Hoàng Ngọc Anh | 77 | view |
- The chart below shows the number of jobs in tourism related industries in one UK city between 1989 and 2009 95
- The two maps below show road acess to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by seclecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The plan below show the layout of a university s sports center now and in the future Summarize the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the number of magazines sold per person in five countries in 2000and 2010 with the projected sales for 2020 77
- The flow chart below shows how glass containers such as bottles are produced and recycled
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, nevertheless, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69458128079 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8715197989 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4710023063 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.125 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317454249418 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141592097509 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065386438979 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207154205388 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529128009765 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.