The chart below shows the number of jobs in tourism-related industries in one UK city between 1989 and 2009.
The bar chart illustrates the number of occupations stemming from three sectors of tourism-related industries in a city in the UK from 1989 to 2009.
Overall, it is clear that industries based on tourism created almost jobs relating to restaurants during the period shown. Additionally, while the number of jobs in restaurants witnessed a remarkable rise, the opposite trends were taken place in the other categories, despite the fluctuations.
Turning into detail, in 1989, there were exactly 800 jobs in sport and leisure, followed by a more-than-700-position figure in travel and tours. Nevertheless, in 1994, travel and tours contributed about 830 vacancies, exceeding the number of sport and leisure, which was nearly 750 positions. During the remaining period, while this number for travel and tours experienced a dramatical decline to just 400 in 2009, this figure for sport and leisure fell slightly to about 700 at the end of the period.
Concerning the other category, jobs in restaurants rose significantly from 1100 in 1989 to above 1500 in 1999. From 1999 to 2009, the figure was fluctuated, reached its peak at 1600 in 2004 before marginally declining to around 1550 in 2009.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-01-29 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 84 | view |
2022-12-13 | maiduc | 78 | view |
2021-05-17 | Hoàng Ngọc Anh | 95 | view |
2020-10-26 | janny1234 | 84 | view |
2019-10-17 | Linhnguyen2901 | 78 | view |
- The table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2000 to 2004 77
- The charts below show water use by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 78
- The chart below shows the number of jobs in tourism related industries in one UK city between 1989 and 2009 95
- The two maps below show road acess to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by seclecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The flow chart below shows how glass containers such as bottles are produced and recycled
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22395833333 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14462155883 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604166666667 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5960552349 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.375 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270603094596 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11621974351 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109566933212 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181288779085 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122514814258 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.