Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
It is thought that there are numerous benefits resulting likely being acquire if a nation hosts international sporting events. However, detractors claim that this may not be as beneficial as initial supposes. With respect to this essay, I will discuss both aspects of this issue, before giving my own perspective.
Firstly, setting up widely televised sports events may bring wealth of advantage to the hosted country. One of the most opt-cited rationale is that by organizing international sports competitions, a country would have global chances to demonstrate the capacity of hosting internationally considerate sports events. If the event proceeds without difficulties, the host nation’s international reputation may be significantly proved, its image as a competent organizer may be built up. Both of which could make an importance to create beneficial values in diplomatic terms. Furthermore, these internationally broadcasted sporting events may also play crucial role to allow a hosting nation promote its culture and customs far and wide through the live broadcasted events. By doing so, the country may attract loads of tourists all over the world which may be a surge in an amount of profit in the tourism sector.
In spite of such advantages, there are also inevitable drawbacks that an organizing country has to consider seriously. The prominence of which is that the financial source of organizing events. Globally sporting events are oftentimes constructed with prohibitively expensive expenses because a sum of money may be earmarked to promote event, building infrastructure, especially preparing necessary facilities and equipment decorating for that sporting competitions. All of which play an important role to ensure the smooth operation of the event. An organizer who have limited financial sources has to take consideration into this problem as the country may be in trouble of corruption and accusations of misspending. Moreover, the problems of finance may have adverse impacts on competitions resulting in widespread discontents among populace which leads to erode the trust of their citizens and even some parts of the world.
Briefly, I think that countries should consider carefully whether they have enough competences in financial aspects to assume as a host organizing globally sporting events or not. It is more beneficial that they can be charge of a host. By contrast, if the condition is not allowed, the sporting event may be of detriment to the social fabric of the host country.
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 67
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000 84
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Other think students should spend time on other important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 78
- The diagram show changes in a student common room 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 911, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...amount of profit in the tourism sector. In spite of such advantages, there are a...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the social fabric of the host country.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, as to, even so, i think, in spite of, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2133.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44132653061 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11986249917 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561224489796 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.771716354 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204546492243 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660553026775 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373008126842 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127134423958 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321714184094 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.