It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Advances in different fields have granted humankind with accessibility to far-flung places such as the South Pole for either science or tourism purposes. Daring as it may sound, this giant leap in our civilization definitely has more benefits to offer.
Regarding the drawbacks, the idea of entering isolated natural habitats might arouse suspicions about people’s safety and ecological unbalance. First of all, it is thought that tourists who are insufficiently equipped will likely suffer from serious health problems due to the severe climate conditions of remoted regions. For example, the temperature on African deserts is often scorching hot during daytime and then it quickly drops at night, which sickens most people if they cannot adapt timely to the abrupt temperature change. Furthermore, as more and more people can manage to reach far-flung regions in the wild, endangered species are put under imminent threats of losing their habitats and eventually becoming extinct. Not only is this extinction a mere disappearance, it also has a detrimental effect on the ecology now that a part of the food chain has vanished.
Given all the aforementioned disadvantages, making adventures to remote areas in the wild is still a worthwhile suggestion because of its potential benefits in terms of science and tourism. Considering science, with technological innovations, scientists can enter distant natural environments to conduct extensive research into the ecology so that schemes for animal protection or nature conservation can be developed without disturbing the animals’ habitats. For instance, sustaining polar bears’ well-being will be feasible should environmentalists are aided to access South Pole with ease. Concerning tourism, journeys to distant natural habitats will surely attract a huge volume of travelers thanks to its novelty. As a result, the touring industry in particular and the economy in general will be exponentially boosted since more vacancies will be open once demands for these kinds of tours rocket.
In conclusion, while the downsides of human’s presence in remote natural environment are undeniable, the long-term effects of it are more significant.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | kevann | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Lanlanlanlan | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Lanlanlanlan | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | zhao_kangg | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | maiduc | 89 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 73
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with that statement 84
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 84
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summaries the information by selecting and reporting t 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, still, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in general, in particular, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1867.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60660660661 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07317121525 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672672672673 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.220189231 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.615384615 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6153846154 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.7692307692 7.06120827912 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203381697349 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601848101272 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405620607923 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111454436905 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257733323522 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, still, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in general, in particular, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1867.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60660660661 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07317121525 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672672672673 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.220189231 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.615384615 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6153846154 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.7692307692 7.06120827912 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203381697349 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601848101272 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405620607923 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111454436905 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257733323522 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.