Some people think that lawbreakers should be sent to prison. However, others think that better talents among those should be made to work. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
There are predominantly two contrasting views where a section of society vehemently deems that lawbreakers should be sent to prison while others emphasize that these people with amazing talents could be useful for society. In this essay, I will discuss both views along with concluding mine opinion.
On the one hand, Apparently, various factors make a section of people advocate that prisons will help felons to educate themselves and ensure the safety of society and have main two reasons to substantiate it. First and foremost, Sending them to prisons will rehabilitate people because guards will teach them the standard of upright conduct life skills. Additionally, With this knowledge, criminals more will adapt to society instead of entering into the crime world. Moreover, the crime rate will be reduced by such effects and this kind of solution would be a permanent fix to such root cause of this problem.
On the other hand, some believe that these criminals could be used as a real talent for the development of the country and have several reasons. Chiefly, it is reasonable to make talents work because it will promote breakthroughs and curb lawless behavior. To illustrate, a convict who is caught because of hacking into a system of the government site could be hired by national leaders to become a cybersecurity expert. This person's expertise could be an asset for the country and also it will give a better standard of life. This kind of opportunity will be supervision to reduce the crime rate of the country.
In my point of view to conclude, the lawbreakers with fruitful skills should be made to work because their intellectual prowess will not be wasted. Although imprisoning them can give them life lessons and deter them, jail terms may harden convicts against the society as a result of the brutalizing treatment they receive.
- Your neighbours have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your house flat Write a letter to your neighbours In your letter explain the reasons for the noise apologise describe what action you will take You should write at least 150 wor 87
- Write a letter to your landlord complaining about noise in the block of flats which he owns You should include Where you live The problem What he should do 87
- You are going to take a vacation soon and want your friend to go with you Write a letter to your friend asking him her to come with you In your letter you should Tell him her why you want the holiday vacation Describe your plan Invite him her to go with y 81
- Social media enable people to keep in touch with each other and learn about news events Do advantages outweigh disadvantages 78
- You are a student at an English language school in Brighton and are living in private accommodation with other flat mates You have not had hot water or heating for some time The landlord s workmen have tried to fix the problem but without success Write a 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... to become a cybersecurity expert. This persons expertise could be an asset for the cou...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, if, may, moreover, so, while, kind of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06840390879 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70290011389 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579804560261 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2049101156 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.692307692 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251496399651 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920303403566 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802079988722 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172609832084 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0828918236226 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... to become a cybersecurity expert. This persons expertise could be an asset for the cou...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, if, may, moreover, so, while, kind of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06840390879 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70290011389 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579804560261 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2049101156 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.692307692 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251496399651 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920303403566 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802079988722 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172609832084 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0828918236226 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.