Some employers are willing to give their workers a certain amount of unpaid leave, believing this benefits the individual and the organization. Other employers see no merit in this arrangement and discourage it.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Both employees and employers share interest in having effective work arrangements. Among these is the polarizing policy of unpaid sabbaticals, which is embraced by some people and rejected by others. Such opposite views will be elucidated in this essay before a personal conclusion is reached.
Proponents of the unpaid-leave approach highlight its multiple benefits on both workers and their companies. Allow a fixed amount of time off without payment helps people to redress balance by discouraging them from overworking. For jobs of which pay increment is inextricably tied to working additional hours such as teaching or working as a cashier, this policy forces in a work-free time frame in which people can pursue their hobbies, returning to work revitalized and motivated afterwards. Such happier frames of mind may translate to further improvement in productivity and quality at work. Also, offering unpaid sabbatical leave minimizes expenses for companies, which will make it easier for departments to be downsized and restructured without spawning high turnout rates.
However, there are convincing arguments in objection to the aforementioned policy. To begin with, its counterpart, paid leave, is phenomenally more prevalent in most modern work places as workers are often drawn towards a stable income. For this reason, subscribing to the unpaid policy may not appeal to the majority of employees, causing them to drift to other organizations with the competitive edge of subsidized leave. On a larger scale, while saving corporate expenses in one, the approach incurs further expenses in recruiting and training new employees. Arranging time off without payment is not to be completely overlooked but it seems suitable to a limited number of work settings such as universities and research labs, where payment is calculated by the completion of short-term tasks like teaching classes or obtaining tangible research results.
Having examined both viewpoints, it is in my conviction that the downsides of the unpaid leave approach far outweigh the benefits, which causes the policy to be suitable for only a small range of work places principally paying workers for their completion of discrete, short-term tasks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-31 | Quân Lê 2020 | 89 | view |
| 2021-05-26 | Quân Lê 2020 | 89 | view |
| 2021-05-22 | Quân Lê 2020 | 84 | view |
- The practice of illegally hunting wild animals continues to cause concern in many countries particularly developing countries What are the causes of such hunting What are the effects on the animals and on the wider human society in these countries and bey 89
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention in school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 89
- Some people believe that a country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The plans below show the changes at a small theater in 2010 and 2012 73
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, while, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51895043732 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00416911757 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600583090379 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.5124901275 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.214285714 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157727804911 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557397754926 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493598509287 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100868536054 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359051689182 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, while, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51895043732 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00416911757 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600583090379 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.5124901275 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.214285714 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157727804911 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557397754926 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493598509287 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100868536054 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359051689182 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.