The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010
The bar graph compares the percentage of renewable energy provided in total energy in four nations namely Australia, Sweden, Iceland and Turkey between 1997 and 2000
It can be obviously seen, the proportions of renewable energy supplied in Sweden and Iceland saw an upward trend, while those in Australia and Turkey decreased gradually and fluctuated, respectively over the 3-year period. In addition, this type of energy chose to use the most by Iceland people.
The percentage of renewable energy provided in Iceland and Sweden witnessed a similar pattern that increased over the time. In 1997, the amount of energy supplied in Sweden started at about 7 percent, whereas that in Iceland started at above 45 percent. There was a gradual increase in the ratio of using renewable energy in Sweden to approximately one out of ten in the last year, 2010. Beside that, Iceland experienced a significant growth and hit the highest point at six tenth in the type of energy given from 1997 to 2010
Regarding to Australia and Turkey, the percentage of renewable energy supplied in Australia was below 10 percent in the beginning then decreased gradually to nearly 5 percent between 1997 and 2010. The proportion of energy supplied in Turkey started at about 38 percent, that increased slightly to above four out of ten then there was a slow went down to 32 percent in 2000 and 2010, respectively.
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples 80
- TOPIC 5 Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples 94
- TOPIC 2 With the rise of e books comes the decline in paper books Some people see this as a good forward step while others do not What are the positive and negative effects of this trend 84
- Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems To what extent do you agree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, then, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1165.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6832582329 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49356223176 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 110.865242709 43.030603864 258% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 166.428571429 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.2857142857 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357395739843 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177702407019 0.103423049105 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653115853764 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237349434275 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357724490714 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.