Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems. To what extent do you agree?
Recently, investing money in infrastructure and transportations raises controversy in society. It is argued that governments should invest their budget on roads and motorways rather than public transport systems. Although this view has its own justification, I firmly agree that public transport systems are the most important priority in each nation.
The first explanation is that spending money on public transport systems is beneficial for citizens. It is obvious that trains and subways lines can carry more people to each cabin and are cheaper when compared to cars and buses. Moreover, public transports also need to be considered because of their convenience. Payment, for instance, a lot of machines for auto-checking were installed helping users to save their time when checking in. When people use public transports for most of their purposes, it is clear that there will be fewer private vehicles on the road.
Another plus point when governments are concerned about public transport systems is that it can solve some major problems that almost all big metropolitans have to deal with. It means that rail transportation and subway systems are established separately from other systems which have turned out to be an alternative route. A prime example is that if citizens choose to take a subway to different destinations, stucking in congestion during peak hours will not be an issue anymore. Moreover, when people use public transports instead of private vehicles, the carbon emission and noise from cars and motorbikes are reduced significantly, which can effectively contribute to environmental protection. Thus, boosting public transport use is a top priority measure for governments to tackle major issues.
To conclude, although infrastructure needs to be invested, spending money on the public transport system also includes some benefits for both users and governments. From my perspective, it is recommended that public transports need to be developed and used widely among citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-09 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-08 | Master Panda | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-21 | DNTMdntm | 56 | view |
| 2022-03-20 | diamondvmp | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-23 | Elaineletere | 78 | view |
- Some people think that childcare centers provide the best services for children of preschool age Other working parents think that family members such as grandparents will be better carers for their kids Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems To what extent do you agree 73
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49677419355 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04003121732 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570967741935 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7991452883 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.6 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294560767521 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106697568934 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667251669954 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1916997396 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483440892259 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.