food and goods bought
The charts provide information about how much food and how many goods which were bought in supermarkets in three European countries over the period of 10 years.
Overall, it can clearly be seen that there was a dramatic increase in the percentage of goods and food which were purchased in all three. However, the expense in both sectors in country 1 was the highest in both years.
Looking at the first chart for more detail, it is evident that there was a significant rise between food bought in 1998 and 2008 in country 1. While there was 10% of food sold in 1998, people spent more money on food in 2018, which accounted for 42% of the total. Next, in country 2, the percentage of food which was bought in 1998 stood at 30% and experienced about 2% more in 2008. This proportion in country 3 reached a low to 5% in 1998, before going up to a half in 2008.
Turning to the goods bought in supermarkets, it was quite similar to the situation of buying food. Making a comparison between country 1 and country 2 in 1998, it is clear that people in country 2 expended on goods more than in country 1, which was twice, namely 40% and 20%. In 2018, the number of goods which were purchased in country 1 reached a peak of 60%. In the same year, although this proportion in country 2 rose to 50% in 2018, it was 10% lower than country 1. Finally, the expense in other products in country 3 was the lowest in both years. On the other hand, there was still an increase in the percentage of goods expend from 2% in 1988 to 10% in 2008.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-29 | AnhNguyen752002 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Jamil Mohsin | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Jamil Mohsin | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Jamil Mohsin | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Jamil Mohsin | 67 | view |
- government and private spending on healthcare 67
- adaptation when living in new country 73
- Some people think the world would be better if we all spoke the same language Do you agree or disagree 73
- Is that doing physical activates more important than having a balanced diet is better than other methods 67
- the adverse impacts of globalization on the cultural identity erosion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, look, so, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 33.7804878049 178% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1243.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 289.0 196.424390244 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.30103806228 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34955995607 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446366782007 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2526234094 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6153846154 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281797958512 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126710242901 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120395677913 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199754682149 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466498811091 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.96 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.