The given bar graph depicts the information about the ratio of household energy utilized and the greenhouse gases developed in Australia.
Looking overall, it is clear that the highest data shown onto water heating in household energy utilized other side heating cooking as well as the stand by lowest data.
Commencing with the ratio of the household energy used in water heating, lighting and heating and cooling is 23%, 11% and 20%, respectively. However, the ratio of refrigeration is 12%, meanwhile, other application has exactly double it. In addition, in cooking and stand by, the ratio is analogous which is accounted at 5%.
Furthermore, the varied significantly difference in cooking and stand by, the former has 4% and the latter has 3%. While, the percentage of greenhouse gas production in lighting and refrigeration is similar, which is near about 7%. The corresponding ratio of the greenhouse gas produced in water heating and other applications is 25% and 26%. However, the proportion of merely highest of the heating and cooking, which accounted at 38% than others.
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050 100
- Scientists believe that computers will become more intelligent than human beings Some people find it a positive development while others think it is negative development Discuss both points and give your own opinion 56
- Alternative sources that use the natural power of wind waves and sun are too expensive and complicated to replace the coal oil and gas that we use to power our cities and transport To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think that paying taxes is enough to contribute to the society other argue that being citizen involves more responsibilities Discuss what is your opinion 78
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, well, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91876406609 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.902580056 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.888888889 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156066761606 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066014011403 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867026908148 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117358654374 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0977393644738 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.