Task 1: The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the bar chart illustrating the passenger distance traveled by different means of transport in the UK in a 10-years gap starting from 1990.
Overall, the total of passenger kilometers traveled had an upward trend between 1990 and 2000; meanwhile, the distance traveled by bicycle and motorbike decreased slightly.
Regarding the length traveled by bus and rail, before they increased bitterly to approximately 44 billion kilometers in 2000, they were accounted for about 43 billions kilometers and 40 billion kilometers, respectively. Moreover, the bus constituted nearly a third of the total distance traveled by different ways of transport in 1990, which rose to 115 billion kilometers in 2000.
When it comes to the distance traveled by bicycle and motorbike, there were downward trends to 3 billion kilometers in 2000. In contrast, the aggregate kilometer commuted by air had an upward trend to 5 billion kilometers in 2000 starting from 2 billions kilometers in 1990. Although the length traveled by air is the lowest in 1990, after ten years, they passed by bicycle and motorbike.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-03-24 | hyst12 | 84 | view |
2022-09-18 | Johndavisvu | 67 | view |
2022-01-10 | tranvuongphuongmy | 84 | view |
2022-01-10 | tranvuongphuongmy | 78 | view |
2021-12-13 | hnhung | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 56
- The map below shows the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 80
- More and more people want to buy famous brands of clothes cars and other items What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- Silver coins in Maine 73
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize their products are new in some ways Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ers traveled had an upward trend between 1990 and 2000; meanwhile, the distance t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93930992873 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531428571429 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2509294282 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179786408198 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108740466427 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831440717997 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148036821886 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844293655774 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.