Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge right and wrong and to behave well. Some say that teachers should only teach students about academic subjects. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
Recently, the question of whether imposing the teachers to help pupils to gain good knowledge about behaviours to judge correctly in society within they are learning other subjects or enforcing educators to teach solely academic lessons for students has been a topic of discussion. While reasons can be given to prove the latter, the former is much more preferable.
On the one hand, in solution teachers just have the responsiblity for making the learners to study scientific subjects without concerning about other necessary attitude is beneficial in some certain ways. Firstly, the more students focusing on advancing academically learning aspects, the more IQ and high thinking ability they gain. In addition, the students concentrate on scientific studying that their teachers offer them, which requiring them to enduringly thinking to finish their assignments, at the same time they are also able to train their critical-thinking skills. Secondly, because they have enough time to experience more valuable knowledge about true or false demeanor throughout surrounding know-how people without the tutors' instruction at school, they are only educated academic subjects. To be more specific, to have more time to practice thinking skills during advanced subjects, teachers just have to teach their learners necessary subjects. And for instance, the schoolchildren' family such as their parents, grandparents, ... will be responsible for telling them how to act regularly and politely in society instead of the helps from teachers. Consequently, after the relatively long time the teacher just give their pupils the opportunity to concentratedly cultivate ability which tackle difficult problems throughout the academic homework, they will have the strongly and fluently intelligent brain.
On the other hand, the counter-argument raised by objectors to mentioned thesis above is that, apart from learning focusedly on intensive subjects at school, the schoolchildren should be teached more about essential behaviours by the educators day in and day out, this opinion really need to take into consideration deeply. Initially, morality is the best fundamental factor to consider the humankind in modern society. Particularly, we will never worry that teaching students at school to behave well regularly is redundant activity, due to we can always more and more accumulate newly crucial lessons about attitude between human-being, not only children but also adults have to understand this basic perception. Next, all the students are still susceptible individuals, which means they are easily attracted by adults' social activity they haven't ever seen before. In other words, teachers have the responsiblity for introducing their juveniles whether actions are positive and negative beside their family's advice. For example, students who aren't teached clearly about right judgement will be obsessed by their bad peers about drugs, smoking and so forth. As a result, to preventing students from illegal behaviours due to their uncontrollably premature thinking, teachers need to teach them not only academic subjects at school but also giving them truly right awareness.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, it is obvious to acknowledge the dominant drawbacks of exclusively learning academic lessons, and the positive benefits of students to percept fully about morality throughout their teachers should not be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-11 | ieatmarblesforlunch | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | ieatmarblesforlunch | 89 | view |
| 2021-06-13 | phuchannn | 73 | view |
- The percentage and exact time weekly males and females spent on house tasks in 2010 of a country 84
- The charts below show the reasons why people want to leave the UK and work in other countries and why some people want to stay at the UK 78
- People in many countries do not wear their traditional costume Some argue that they would forget their history and tradition Do you agree or disagree 56
- The graph shows the size of ozone layer hole in Antarctic and the production of three kinds of ozone damaging gases from 1980 to 2000 73
- Some people argue that advertising is discouraging people from being different individuals and makes people to be or seem to be the same Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
Recently, the question of whether imposing the teachers to help pupils to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 736, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tutors'' or 'tutor's'?
Suggestion: tutors'; tutor's
...surrounding know-how people without the tutors instruction at school, they are only ed...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'educators'' or 'educator's'?
Suggestion: educators'; educator's
... more about essential behaviours by the educators day in and day out, this opinion really...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 843, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...ttracted by adults social activity they havent ever seen before. In other words, teach...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1045, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...milys advice. For example, students who arent teached clearly about right judgement w...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, apart from, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 41.998997996 195% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2933.0 1615.20841683 182% => OK
No of words: 514.0 315.596192385 163% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70622568093 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76146701107 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94464594954 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 176.041082164 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538910505837 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 900.0 506.74238477 178% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.3215403367 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.944444444 106.682146367 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5555555556 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3888888889 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317096031778 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950715600853 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591145048948 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201014795324 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327197396353 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 152.0 78.4519038076 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.