Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention in school. What are the reasons? What could be done to solve this problem?
It has been observed that several students struggle to maintain their focus at school. This issue tends to take roots in two main reasons and could be resolved with two corresponding remedies.
Discussing the principal causes for such inattentiveness, people highlight the impact of learning contents in syllabus and delivery methods. In specific, students are subjected to increasing amounts of academic knowledge while the understanding of which is not effectively facilitated by uninspiring teaching techniques, such as the force-feeding method. Without proper encouragement and support, overwhelmed learners may find it hard to keep up. Aside from this, students’ unhealthy lifestyles also factor in. Frequent late nights and lack of important nutrients, for instance, could be detrimental to brain health, rendering shortened attention span.
Having examined these aforementioned elements, there are two possible solutions. On one hand, learning standards need to be reviewed, filtering out unnecessary contents and improving its cohesion to practical contexts. Simultaneously, teachers’ pedagogy needs to be updated, making use of more leaner-center strategies to make classrooms more engaging and allow students to receive help when needed. On the other hand, parents can help with changes in students’ lifestyles. For instance, there should be a limit to the usage of smart devices and home-prepared meals, using guidelines from dietitians, would help improve students’ focus.
In brief, overbearing workloads and unbalanced routines seem to be two main causes for students’ lack of concentration in school. Thus, efforts to adjust academic training and promote healthier habits are instrumental.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-10-04 | hien3112 | 78 | view |
2023-09-07 | ngo viet | 56 | view |
2023-08-19 | Nguyen Hai Dang | 89 | view |
2023-08-17 | ngango56 | 67 | view |
2023-08-15 | Anne020304 | 89 | view |
- Light pollution excessive light during night time is a form of pollution that distresses many people especially in modern cities What are the causes of light pollution and what solutions can you suggest for governments and businesses to take 84
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots Is this a negative or positive development 67
- Many believe that it is important to protect all wild animals while others think that it is important to protect some not all of them Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some employers are willing to give their workers a certain amount of unpaid leave believing this benefits the individual and the organization Other employers see no merit in this arrangement and discourage it Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mote healthier habits are instrumental.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, thus, while, for instance, in brief, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.95161290323 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24265759892 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.70564516129 0.561755894193 126% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7224072547 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.428571429 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7142857143 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180418709515 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053911133387 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427536956121 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109221562247 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292545689437 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.93 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mote healthier habits are instrumental.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, thus, while, for instance, in brief, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.95161290323 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24265759892 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.70564516129 0.561755894193 126% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7224072547 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.428571429 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7142857143 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180418709515 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053911133387 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427536956121 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109221562247 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292545689437 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.93 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.