Nowadays, it is clearly seen that people have caused a lot of severe damages to the flora and fauna on our planet. While many people suppose that it is too late to do something, I would argue that actions can be taken to improve the situation.
On the one hand, there are various reasons why some people think that it is too late to repair human’s damage to plants and animals throughout the world. Firstly, a huge number of animals and plants that was extinct or endangered. For example, species like Dodo birds or Tasmania wolves have vanished. For these animals, the only way to bring them back to our planet is turning back the hand of time which is impossible. Moreover, the melting of polar ice caps pushes polar bears into starvation and losing their habitats. The rising sea level also reduces the areas for fresh water to grow plants. Secondly, it is easy to recognize that human have brought about many serious destruction to the planet’s ecosystem. Human are primarily responsible for causing global warming and other critical problems that have negative effect on the flora and fauna on the Earth.
On the other hand, I believe that there are measures that governments and individuals can take to improve this problem. First, governments should have strict laws against deforestation. For example, the South African government outlawed deforestation in 2015 and since then the results have been impressive as many species have been saved from extinction. Second, the administration should also have policies to preserve endangered animals and plants from being extinct. They can construct more national park to reserve the fauna that is threaten.
In conclusion, although some may feel pessimistic that the damage done to the natural world is irreparable, it seems to me that with proper actions in education and law, human still can stop the negative impact on the ecosystem.
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife while there are other problems that are more important Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that it should be compulsory for people to retake their driving test every 5 years What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing this 89
- As a result of tourism and the increasing number of people travelling there is an growing demand for more flights What problems does this have on the environment What measures could be taken to solve the problems 89
- In cities and towns all over the world the high volume of traffic is a problem What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem 56
- More and more newspapers and news channels are using photographs to support their news articles and stories Some people think photographs are not a reliable source of news while others consider photographs to be irrefutable Discuss both sides and give you 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 664, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun destruction seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much serious destruction', 'a good deal of serious destruction'.
Suggestion: much serious destruction; a good deal of serious destruction
...recognize that human have brought about many serious destruction to the planet’s ecosystem. Human are pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 539, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'threatened'.
Suggestion: threatened
...ional park to reserve the fauna that is threaten. In conclusion, although some may fe...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, as for, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04444444444 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60158681736 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593650793651 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7819862501 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3125 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6875 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220868888457 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671475308825 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868249751867 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140414514289 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511961213836 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.