The figures give information about economic growth and household expenditure across a range of categories.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts show economic growth over a 15-year period and compare the changes of household spending among six groups: housing, food, clothing, entertainment, travel and other spending.
Overall, economic growth reached its peak in 2005 and reached the lowest point in 2008. It is also obvious that the vast majority of household expenditure was housing.
In 1995, economic growth began at a modest over 1%. In the next seven years, none of years that rose over 2,5%. After reaching its peak in 2005 (nearly 5%), it experienced a dramatical drop by almost 10%. However, from 2008 to 2010, it went up by 6%.
In the same year, housing made up over 30% of the spending and became the highest household expenditure that people spent on. Although it witnessed a small decrease by 2000, it immediately increased with the same percentage as in 1995. The same pattern can be seen for food. Interestingly, both three aspects: clothing, entertainment and travel experience no growth in four different years. Clothing had been the highest outlay in the first three years before those three aspects shared the same proportion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-23 | poca | view | |
| 2022-10-23 | Đặng Luân | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-17 | lili__nhnh | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-12 | phamkhuyen | 68 | view |
- The table below shows the projected costings over the next five year in American dollars for three environmental projects for sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first year as the projects are set 72
- The graph below shows the percentage of part time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- The figure shows the results of a survey of 1000 adolescents in five different countries The participants were asked at what age they believed certain rights and responsibilities should be granted to young people Summarise the information by selecting and 61
- The inequality between rich and poor nations is now wider than it has ever been before What do you think are the main causes of this difference and what do you think can be done to reduce the gap 89
- The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03243243243 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65492912309 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654054054054 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8298464304 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.5833333333 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4166666667 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0905161018835 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0326556218718 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352665820424 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.061982017893 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268225307666 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.