The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The line graph compares the percentage of elderly people in USA, Sweden, Japan over a course of 100 years, starting from 1940, including predictions through 2040.
Overall, it is evident that the proportion of people aged 65 or over in three countries all experienced an increase over the period shown, with the most dramatic rise taken place in Japan's figures.
In 1940, USA had the largest proportion of old people at around 9%, which was followed by Sweden and Japan at approximately 6 % and 5% respectively. Over the next 60 years, while Sweden and USA has witnessed a steady rise in figures to roughly 15%,the proportion of people older than 65 in Japan fluctuated with an overall downward trend, however, by 2000, it had recovered to its starting figure.
Despite remaining at a relatively low number, Japan is predicted to have nearly 27% of its population is elderly people in 2040, with an exponential growth of five times in only 40 years. The proportion of population aged 65 or over in USA and Sweden also continues their rising trend, with the former expected to increase more slowly than the latter, reaching a high of 23% and 25% in turn in 2040. It is clearly seen that USA had the lowest figure in the end despite having the largest proportion of aged population in 1940.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-04 | Parth panchal0908 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 87
- The graph shows the percentage of female members of Parliament in European countries between 2000 and 2012 87
- proportion of population aged 65 and over in Japan Sweden and USA
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 73
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76339285714 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62110710753 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566964285714 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.0515225365 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.428571429 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182961465188 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979052169313 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0320879055595 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121372327505 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030601199234 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.