The maps below show the changes experienced by the town of Lakeside at the beginning of the 21st century.
The maps illustrate the development in the town of Lakeside from 2000 to 2009.
As can be seen from the maps, the area witnessed significant changes. There was considerable development in facilities, except for the lake in the middle of this area
On the left side of the river, the derelict warehouses were converted into a car park, the residential area adjacent to the river was demolished to make way for a shopping center. Both arts center and old town were knocked down, only the residential area adjacent to old town remained. In 2009, offices and part of an univeristy were constructed in the place where the old town used to be. Schools increased in number.
On the other side of the river, the residential area was removed and the industrial complex expanded, which even covered the residential area in the past. Furthermore, the lake decreased in size and turned into a pond connecting with the river.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-20 | Vuthungan | 41 | view |
| 2021-06-17 | my220904 | 61 | view |
| 2021-06-04 | BHAVANI KESIREDDY | 11 | view |
| 2020-04-21 | Yen Pham | 75 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | koinoyokan | 74 | view |
- The plans
- THE DIAGRAM BELOW SHOWS A POSSIBLE FUTURE MEANS OF HOME ENERGY PRODUCTION 84
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 78
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is considered very important Why might this be the case Is this a positive or negative development 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e town of Lakeside from 2000 to 2009. As can be seen from the maps, the area w...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or the lake in the middle of this area On the left side of the river, the derel...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to be. Schools increased in number. On the other side of the river, the resi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 759.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83439490446 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7663557704 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566878980892 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 71.3227698565 43.030603864 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.875 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0695960473642 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390838077096 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638687105483 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.061676372439 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788386163669 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.