Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, gender equality has become a huge topic of conversation around the world. One of the arguments is that whether higher education should have the same proportion of male and female pupils in every subject. I partly agree with this idea.
On the bright side, an equal number of men and women contributes to equal opportunities for both groups in terms of career and social status. Some jobs, like lawyer, teacher, and doctor are almost impossible to obtain without proper education. Gender balance in the workforce also reduces social stereotypes and improves mutual respect within society.
However, it is neither realistic nor efficient to have the same number of two sexes in every subject. Firstly, the ratio of boys to girls in most countries is not fifty-fifty. China and some South-East Asia countries are currently struggling with gender imbalance as the number of boy babies in the last few decades far surpassed that of girls. Secondly, some jobs might be more suitable for one group than the other. For example, a builder is a masculine work that fits men better than women because men's body biologically has better physical strength than women's. The third and last reason is that universities should evaluate their students by performance instead of gender. Academically capable students can fully utilize the benefit of high education and potentially become proficient workforce in the future. It will be a waste of time, money, and effort pushing inadequate students into achieving something beyond their ability.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-25 | Ahmad_off | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-25 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | yomost232131 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | hien2422006 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-07 | lee giang | 73 | view |
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people traveling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The diagram shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for it How can people research it 61
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20080321285 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65219618629 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.658634538153 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4362765533 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7857142857 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182258301144 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536594758416 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600332572339 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122012410223 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571545093349 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.