The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a
European country between 1979 and 2004…
The given line graph reveals statistics about the average consumption of fish, lamb, chicken, and beef by each person in a nation of Europe from 1979 to 2004. Looking from an overall perspective, with the exception of chicken, which increased, the consumption of all kinds of meat decreased over the whole period. In addition, fish was consumed less than meat every year.
Beef and fish were the highest and lowest categories at the beginning of the period with over 50 grams and 200 grams eaten by each individual per week, respectively. Subsequently, the amount of beef peaked at about 250 grams in 1984, but then significantly dropped to approximately 100 grams in 2004. Meanwhile, a slight decline to roughly 50 grams, was recorded in the figure for fish.
Lamb and beef started with a similar amount of about 150 grams in the first year but showed a reverse trend afterward. There was a gradual fall in the consumption of lamb to around 60 grams per person per week. The figure for chicken, in contrast, rose dramatically and overtook beef in 1989 before hitting its highest point of 250 grams in 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
- The line graph shows Paris Metro station passengers Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000 84
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions To what extent you agree or disagree 89
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions 84
- The table shows oil production in Africa countries from 2000 to 2004 unit barrels 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...4. Looking from an overall perspective, with the exception of chicken, which increased, the consumpti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...its highest point of 250 grams in 2004.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, so, then, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8219895288 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66411388827 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570680628272 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0442401178 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155707712584 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666793265599 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496402686712 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11164660263 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800486849714 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.