Some think the best way to motivate and encourage people to work hard is to pay them based on
how much they produce and sell.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
One of the responsibilities of a manager is to motivate their employees to increase their performance. However, I cannot entirely agree that basing their salaries on their production and sales rates would be the most effective method.
The performance, in many cases, cannot simply be quantified in terms of sales or production. A teacher's job, for example, is to teach classes, assess homework, and provide students with feedback, none of which involves producing or selling any goods. In this case, it is her students' performance and their levels of satisfaction with aspects of her performance such as rapport or punctuality that decide how successful he has been.
Furthermore, the performance of many workers is greatly affected by external factors beyond their control. The state of the economy, unexpected political developments, and extreme weather conditions can all have significant impacts on how much a worker can sell or produce. A hurricane, for example, can quickly devastate a farm and all its produce without its workers being responsible for any of the damages or the ensuing drop in production rates. Basing wages on sales or production rates would demotivate workers in such cases.
Some may argue that it is difficult to assess anything other than a worker's output, making any other appraisal form less effective. However, managers these days have tools such as questionnaires and Customer Relations Management platforms that allow them to form a relatively clear picture of a worker's overall performance.
In conclusion, I think deciding how much an employee should earn based solely on their sales or production figures would be both impossible and unfair in most, if not all, cases. Instead, employers should look at a more diverse set of performance indicators, including customer satisfaction and punctuality.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-03 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 11 | view |
| 2022-05-08 | Lunar Tran | 84 | view |
| 2022-05-08 | Lunar Tran | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-08 | Revivo Tulaseket | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-26 | rajpatel90 | 78 | view |
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 44
- The maps show improvements that have been made to a university campus between 2010 and the present day 87
- The maps 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...ivate workers in such cases. Some may argue that it is difficult to assess anything...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 294, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a worker' or simply 'workers'?
Suggestion: a worker; workers
...m to form a relatively clear picture of a workers overall performance. In conclusion, I...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37370242215 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0388306837 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602076124567 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7307485303 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.461538462 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109582404768 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0364117221579 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0291133241785 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.058255395472 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018632706046 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.