The graph below shows the percentage of different waste disposal in 4 countries

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the percentage of different waste disposal in 4 countries.

The given bar chart demonstrates the percentage of urban waste dealt with via four methods in 4 different countries.

Regarding to the proportion of land-filled waste, it is considered the most common means to dispose garbage in 3 countries, namely the uk with the highest rate (60%) and italy, spain each takes 45% for the former, 40% for the latter, but it seems like Netherland doesn’t prefer this tackle due to the lowest amount with 10%. Otherwise, the most popular ways in Netherland is burnt, accounting for 48%. In contrast, burnt garbage instantly constitute the second lowest trends through the rate of 13%, 10% and 8% in Italy, UK and Spain, respectively.

In terms of recycled waste, it make up approximately 32% in Italy, Spain and UK. To be more specific, the Italy and UK share the same proportion with 30%, doubling the rate of this ways in Netherland; moreover, spain indicates the highest number of 35%. Turning to the biological treatment, obviously, this term occupy 30%, the second highest rate in Netherland, but in remaining countries, it is interesting to note that the waste treated biologically deal with the lowest amount, at approximately 8%, especially there is no data about this solution is recorded in UK (0%).

Overall, it can be seen that among four solutions, the highest amount of urban waste is disposed through landfill. Meanwhile, environment-friendly ways such as biological relations are utilized to treat small number of garbage.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-03 Giang Tran 84 view
2024-11-02 Giang Tran 67 view
2024-11-02 Giang Tran 67 view
2024-11-02 Giang Tran 67 view
2024-10-26 Giang Tran 73 view
Essays by user phuchannn :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...vely. In terms of recycled waste, it make up approximately 32% in Italy, Spain an...
^^^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...oportion with 30%, doubling the rate of this ways in Netherland; moreover, spain ind...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, while, in contrast, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11157024793 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97792862167 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578512396694 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 89.4278107377 43.030603864 208% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 137.444444444 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8888888889 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0778856908532 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369675459732 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566855873781 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0707224434036 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060902476026 0.0819641961636 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.