The given table illustrates data how students estimated 4 different aspects of University in 2005, 2010 and 2015 years.
Overall, it is clear that library resoirses have been stabilize highly rated all over the period, while range of moduls offered vice versa was in low rate.
According to results of surveys in 2005, 74% students evaluated teaching quality as a good aspect of University nd this indicator decline in 2% after 5 year, reching 72%, but in 2015 year it increases in 4% compare with 2005. Also, there was a sharp rise in the number of learnners giving for students services a good rating, particullary in the first years:from 54% in 2005, to 81% in 2010 and 95% in 2015 years.
The percentage of students giving assessment for sport and social facilities maintains a same level over the all periods , 65% respectively. Finally, there were poor ratings at the beginning of the period for range of moduls offered 39% in 2005 and they got worse, failing steadily to 31% in 2010 and 25% in 2015.
- Many students choose to take a gap year before starting university to travel or gain work experience Do you think this is a good idea or a waste of time 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The illustrations show how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 11
- The line graph gives information about the number of Iranian Greek and Turkish students who enrolled at Sheffield University between 2005 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 60
- It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects What are causes And what will be effected on society 73
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 55, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'stabilized'.
Suggestion: stabilized
... clear that library resoirses have been stabilize highly rated all over the period, while...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 121, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ntains a same level over the all periods , 65% respectively. Finally, there were p...
^^
Line 4, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r ratings at the beginning of the period for range of moduls offered 39% in 2005 ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76571428571 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.583422197 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668571428571 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.0966762799 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1666666667 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149120048412 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076362881894 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644095989526 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924373024593 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690154491254 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.