Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Everything in the world is developing and have a past. It may be scientific problem, mankind, technology, tea., everything has it own evolution and it is important to to these changes for referential purposes. Regarding whether knowing past can or can not help people o make important decisions today is a contentious one. I mostly support knowing past can help us to make important decisions in the future and support my argument with three reason. Past will always be a reference for many upcoming generations. The human kind evolution is based on knowing past and trying to renovate things from the past to develop a pleasant society today.
To begin, past is always a laid road that can be used to refer the actual things happened previous and construct a clear picture of what went wrong and what went right from it. For instance, let us talk about Hiroshima and Nagasaki were one of the most developed places in the world. The use of nuclear weapons have destroyed these cities so much that, they re still having the effects of the nuclear blast. Another similar example is the Chernobyl, a peaceful town has has been effected by a small mistake took place in a nearby nuclear factory. The events took place 4 or 5 decades ago and turned Chernobyl into a deserted place. Even after a long time people are restricted to nearby the town and in case if anyone is exposed to the radiator can catch severe cancer. This example has laid few restriction and ban on nuclear power and its use. Therefore, knowing events happened in history and deciding according to them is necessary.
Furthermore, Knowing about the past provides history related to a topic and enables us to understand things better than can be used to decide what kind of decisions to be made if a similar situation is encountered. For example, melting polar ice caps is a burning issue that if not monitored can create a disaster. Scientists have been monitoring the reason for melting ice caps as “greenhouse effect”, and cause of greenhouse effect is “traping the heat and radiations from sun”, and cause of heat traping-“increase pollution”. Therefore, the nations that constitute a larger amount of population decided to follow strict policies and green technologies to reduce their amount of pollution. Therefore, it can be noted that using knowledge from the past will constitute in making big decision and solve problem that can severely effect mankind.
Finally, past play an important role in present and future situations. There is always a chain of things happening currently that are connected with the previous doings. For example, let us talk about a hypothetical situation, if a village population is growing then it requires more, food, space to live, etc. Hence, people start to cut trees, then slowly people cut more and more trees which causes the problem of deforestation in the village and there is a chance that the nearby villages might be effected by this deforestation and the worst affect of deforestation is showed in rainfall which in turn causes drought and hikes the prices of everything available near to those villages. Here if people shall plant trees in such area and help in the betterment of the village and can reframe the initial situation back. Hence, decisions can always be made from past that can be helpful for future well being.
Although, past is used to understand and gain experience with the technology changes in the technology are encountered every now an then. This can change the way of solving a problem and people might not need much to think now-a-days because machine are doing much of the work. Tracking past in such situation may not be useful and it can also cost us time, money and effort to invest in knowing past.
In conclusion, increasing use of technology does not need to track or know things that happened in the past. But, in most of the cases past can lay a clear road for us to understand and solve things. Past can be reason for tidy’s future and can provide better understanding to how people react when similar situation are encounter in the past. Although technology can reduce the burden to solve a problem, past can be helpful for making important decision to s=use technology and solve an issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-25 | Gnyana | 58 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | kalp98403 | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-23 | Sujan Adhikari | 70 | view |
| 2022-07-21 | idris oriyomi | 58 | view |
| 2022-05-12 | Millan | 50 | view |
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supportin 66
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 58
- The following report appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces A study reports that in nearby East M 58
- We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take 66
- The following is a letter to the editor of the Waymarsh Times Traffic here in Waymarsh is becoming a problem Although just three years ago a state traffic survey showed that the typical driving commuter took 20 minutes to get to work the commute now takes 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'owns'?
Suggestion: owns
...nd, technology, tea., everything has it own evolution and it is important to to the...
^^^
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...as it own evolution and it is important to to these changes for referential purposes....
^^^^^
Line 2, column 466, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: has
...ample is the Chernobyl, a peaceful town has has been effected by a small mistake took p...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...he technology are encountered every now an then. This can change the way of solvin...
^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: AN_THEN[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'and then'?
Suggestion: and then
...he technology are encountered every now an then. This can change the way of solving a p...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, hence, if, may, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 37.0 19.5258426966 189% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 28.0 12.4196629213 225% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 35.0 14.8657303371 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 102.0 58.6224719101 174% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3535.0 2235.4752809 158% => OK
No of words: 726.0 442.535393258 164% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86914600551 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.19079831727 4.55969084622 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70629050592 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 334.0 215.323595506 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460055096419 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1104.3 704.065955056 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7051607479 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.46875 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6875 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46875 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1735560667 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535650497366 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458572939122 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108261518135 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636597606944 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 100.480337079 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'owns'?
Suggestion: owns
...nd, technology, tea., everything has it own evolution and it is important to to the...
^^^
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...as it own evolution and it is important to to these changes for referential purposes....
^^^^^
Line 2, column 466, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: has
...ample is the Chernobyl, a peaceful town has has been effected by a small mistake took p...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...he technology are encountered every now an then. This can change the way of solvin...
^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: AN_THEN[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'and then'?
Suggestion: and then
...he technology are encountered every now an then. This can change the way of solving a p...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, hence, if, may, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 37.0 19.5258426966 189% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 28.0 12.4196629213 225% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 35.0 14.8657303371 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 102.0 58.6224719101 174% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3535.0 2235.4752809 158% => OK
No of words: 726.0 442.535393258 164% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86914600551 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.19079831727 4.55969084622 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70629050592 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 334.0 215.323595506 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460055096419 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1104.3 704.065955056 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7051607479 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.46875 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6875 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46875 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1735560667 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535650497366 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458572939122 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108261518135 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636597606944 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 100.480337079 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.