As well as making money, businesses have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree?
Besides being profitable, enterprises are believed to be responsible for social-related problems. I strongly agree with his opinion and discussed below are several primary reasons which support my perspective.
To begin with, companies are aware of the significance of environmental preservation. In other words, it is undoubted that they have taken measures to protect the environment; furthermore, the government has introduced restrictions on businesses to reinforce their behaviours. For example, firms are only allowed to carry out projects if they can prove the amount of resources they use is acceptable; moreover, some companies encourage their employees to participate in environmental volunteer work by rewarding them more days off work. This directly suggests that protecting the environment is high on the agenda of enterprises.
Another justification worth mentioning is that companies take people's health into consideration. To be specific, they scrutinize whether their products have a positive or an adverse bearing on customers’ well-being. Labelling acts as a prime example of the idea. Every food item is labeled with details about calories, or all of the products containing tobacco have a warning on them. What can be inferred from this is that the producers greatly take their customers' health into account.
On the other hand, people who hold an opposite view consider that companies’ organizers should only concentrate on generating income. They point out that businesses are set up to benefit people; as a result, other aspects should not be concerned and need to be eliminated. However, they are also part of this world, thus it is their duty to take part in improving society. Otherwise stated, everyone is responsible for developing life, including firms.
In conclusion, I believe businesses should not only generate revenue but they are also necessitated to contribute to make the world a better place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- The pie charts below show a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years
- The diagram below shows one method of manufacturing ceramic pots 78
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil 56
- The pie charts indicate changes in the proportions of energy produced in a country from 1983 to 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 37
- In many countries people like to eat a wider variety of food than can be grown in the local area As a result much of the food today we eat has to come from other regions Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 374, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...duty to take part in improving society. Otherwise stated, everyone is responsible for dev...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54026845638 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16039156775 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644295302013 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8385549923 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.1875 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0625 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109883919878 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0322878187974 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358156775301 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0627266434796 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247099449469 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.