Some people believe that unpaid community
service should be a compulsory part of high
school programmes (for example working for a
charity, improving the neighborhood or
teaching sports to younger children).
To what extent do you agree of disagree?
Irrefutably, in the contemporary era, unpaid community service plays a part and parcel role in pupils' development and expertise advancement. Therefore, some individuals perceive this, to establish as an obligatory part of the High School curriculum. I completely agree with the rubric and the impending essay will substantiate my verdict.
To commence with the favor of notion, factors are abundant behind the standpoint. Firstly, if the students volunteer for any nonprofitable government organization (NGO) and charity, it assists them to develop expertise like leadership, communication, humbleness, and cognitive skills enhancement. For instance, Red Cross Society is a students unit, it provides grocery items, medication, and clothes to the unprivileged and the needy during the natural catastrophe. Hence, volunteering to be a part of each disciple's life to become a brilliant version of themselves.
The second predominant factor is to upbuild child's mental and physical health to achieve this, the sports and physical exercises should be a background of school's activities. In other words, it does not help only to keep fit but also guide future career choice which is an employment or profession for many players.To illustrate, research conducted by Delhi University stated that the top renowned players who won many medals in Olympics and Asian games, began to play the games during their school days and they grew up their inclination through the distinct Inter-school sports competitions.
In conclusion, considering everything up to the hilt, it is evident that nonprofitable community services are essential for the overall development of a student. Therefore, I agree to enforce a law to become this, as a mandatory part of the High School programs.
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 78
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 67
- The bar chart below shows the proportion of English men and women of different ages who were leaving alone in 2011 The pie chart compares the number of bedrooms in one person households 78
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree of disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'skills'' or 'skill's'?
Suggestion: skills'; skill's
...ommunication, humbleness, and cognitive skills enhancement. For instance, Red Cross So...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...ployment or profession for many players.To illustrate, research conducted by Delhi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54243542435 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21191800333 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653136531365 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.078841516 49.4020404114 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.545454545 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6363636364 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206382641573 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704315916695 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383312938676 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122140810628 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385707049116 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.