The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
The two maps compare the massive changes in the road entryway of a city hospital in 2 years 2007 and 2010.
Looking at the maps, it can be seen that the old road access developed significantly with new routes and infrastructures.
In particular, the city hospital stayed in the same location, surrounded by Ring Road, for both two years. However, two new roundabouts were constructed in the Hospital Road, one on the intersection with Ring Road and the other on the junction with City Road. Moreover, the car park for all the staff and citizens on the right side of the Hospital Road was decreased in size. It was then only used for the staff and a new public park was erected next to the hospital in the East. Looking at the other side of the Hospital Road, there was a new bus station, connected with the other two roads by small paths. By contrast, a small bus stop on the right corner of the map in 2007 was demolished to make room for a roundabout in 2010.
- The chart shows the amount and quality of water supplied in two regions of the world 67
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals during festival periods people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- The maps below show the changes in the city of Nelson in recent times 45
- In some countries young people have become richer healther and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, moreover, then, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 790.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43820224719 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55333215877 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 14.8996644258 43.030603864 35% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.75 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377898043455 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182337925169 0.103423049105 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126278549615 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285657421384 0.15604864568 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156787514544 0.0819641961636 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.