The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand s population from 1950 to 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand's population from 1950 to 2050. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates the proportion of people at four different age groups living in New Zealand over a century period starting from 1950.
In general, the initial impression from the chart is New Zealand had an aged population, as the oldest people will remain the largest population, with overall rises predicted for the number of teenagers and middle-aged people, as opposed to an anticipated decrease in 25-37 aged group over the surveyed period.
With approximately 60% of the total population, the elderly accounted for the largest numbers among four aged-group citizens, more than twice the figure for the second-largest group, people aged 38-45. In the subsequent 40 years, the former rose slightly to a peak at about 70%. Similarly, the latter showed a significant increase of a quarter percentage point, reaching its highest point at roughly 50% before dipping to 10% around 2000. Both figures are projected to decrease in the near future: by 2050, the number of people aged over 65 in New Zealand will have fallen to less than its initial level, and that for 38-45 group to only two-fifth.
It is notable that there was a major decline in the working population aged from 25 to 37. The people in this age group fell by a further one-tenth percent from 20% in 1950 to 10% in 2000 and is forecast to become the group with the lowest figure in 2050. Despite having the smallest population during the first four decades at 5%, people aged 0-14 witnessed a continuous rise in population and surpassed the former group in 2010. Its figure is expected to peak at 20% in 2050.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-08-23 Han Duyen 73 view
2021-08-20 Han Duyen view
2021-08-20 Han Duyen view
2021-08-20 Han Duyen 20 view
2021-07-08 Anna Ho 84 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, similarly, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 272.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84926470588 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60102694235 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 106.607317073 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 283.868780488 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.062542281 43.030603864 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.9 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127400316279 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603025892618 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485656971481 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993964787995 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534657495026 0.0819641961636 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, similarly, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 272.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84926470588 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60102694235 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 106.607317073 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 283.868780488 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.062542281 43.030603864 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.9 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127400316279 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603025892618 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485656971481 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993964787995 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534657495026 0.0819641961636 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.