Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The controversy regarding how the college pupils should learn came from two groups with different points of view. The first group states students should become independent learners while another group claims that the best way for undergraduates to learn is by suggesting to them any subjects that will be applicable and fit with their future. This essay will attempt to briefly explain those two perspectives, then at the end, the author will decide which side she stands on.
Firstly, people who believe that students should be free to choose what kind of courses she/he wants to learn, assume sophomores are in the mature age stage hence they should already know what they desire and don't. The upside from this opinion is that with this kind of treatment, the freshman will be encouraged to become more responsible of and mature in dealing with any situation. For instance, once their decision turns out not to work well or fails then it will be a life lesson so they can re-evaluate and create solutions towards it. The downside is the possibility for the college pupil to become perplexed and frustrated might happen, since they are used to being guided/dictated to by their parents.
Secondly, the communities who suggest scholars should only take several subjects that fit with future industry, see students as children who need to be guided and taught many things. The benefit is that freshmen become more focused on learning so the risk of them failing can be suppressed. However, they will depend on their parents or other people since they can not resolve problems. Besides, further threat in Indonesia will lack non-exact experts as common people have the mindset that if they want to be successful in career, the options are only two: by studying science or technology fields.
Considering the two opposing opinions, the author tends to be on the same page with the first opinion. Indeed, this view is relatively new to most Indonesian where parents often dictate their children in the name of care and love. The author suggests parents can familiarize their children with decision making from an early age, as simple as giving the toddler the authority to choose their daily wear
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 78
- As computers are being used more and more in education there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom 84
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 79
- The graph below shows the percentage of part time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010 89
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2005 2010 and 2015 about McGill University Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...hould already know what they desire and dont. The upside from this opinion is that w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, briefly, first, firstly, hence, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for instance, kind of, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1837.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00544959128 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49992241265 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577656675749 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 11.0 2.52805611222 435% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.4242422034 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.214285714 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2142857143 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287702254137 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958847195902 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630997447723 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171312765584 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0964936441823 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.