Some people claim that museums and art galleries are not needed today, because everyone can see historical objects or artworks by computer. Do you agree or disagree?
It is supposed by some people that it is unnecessary to show artworks at art galleries or museums nowadays because the computer could help visitors to see these works at home. While it is true that everything including in the art field becomes easier thanks to advanced technology, I believe that museums and art galleries are irreplaceable in our lives.
To begin with, there are some main reasons why computer plays an important role in exhibiting those artworks. Initially, due to the increasing development of state-to-the-art technology, the cheaper cost of opening an exhibition on the computer created a better profit for artists and organizations. This means artists do not need to rent a large public place or workers to take care of these works. As a result, the profit of showing a case might increase based on this convenience. Secondly, because of online showcases, these galleries could have access to the larger popularity instead of a small number of guests as a direct one. For example, a Russian completely could view artwork from Vietnam or the United State. This not only helps to broaden the market for a certain artist but also reduces transportation fees for people who care about arts that originated from different cultures.
However, I would argue that it is vital to remain direct and face-to-face museums and art exhibitions for some noticeable causes. The most significant cause is that these galleries help to attract tourists and professionals who travel to a particular country to enjoy the unique beauty of every country. For instance, a fashion exhibition in Paris has been bringing a billion USD to this nation. In this way, France could advertise the traditional and cultural beauty of their nation, as well as create an opportunity to develop the tourism industry. Moreover, the reality of showcases could inspire and touch viewers’ hearts easier than those which are shown on a screen. This helps owners of those works sell their products in an easy way.
In conclusion, although computer becomes a great way to illustrate artworks, I believe that it is important to maintain authentic museums and art exhibitions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-16 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 92 | view |
| 2020-06-02 | haphuongpham49 | 84 | view |
- The most essential component of a person s life is his or her time at working place and life turns meaningless once no job satisfaction is obtained To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- TASK 2 As parts of education students should spend a period of time living in another country to learn its language and culture To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 594, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...ess to the larger popularity instead of a small number of guests as a direct one. For example, a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 727, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an easy way" with adverb for "easy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ners of those works sell their products in an easy way. In conclusion, although computer b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1186440678 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88272926173 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581920903955 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6215613356 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.25 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4375 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190414232667 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057524279996 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652862979175 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130869191098 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817842328684 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.