The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030.
The line graph illustrates the daily average number of UK residents using car, bus or train for commuting over a 60 year period
Overall, the number of UK commuters traveling by car and train has increased since the start of the period, with expectations for even more reliance on these transportations. In contrast, the bus has decreased moderately in popularity over the period with predictions for a similar trend in the future
With regard to car, this has been the most popular transportation in the UK since 1970, which was used by around 5 million commuters in the beginning. This number remained unchanged until 1980, then steadily increased with projections of a surge to its peak at 9 millions in 2030. A similar trend was also witnessed in the number of car-travelers, nonetheless, it began the period with only half of the figure for the train with 2 millions.
In terms of bus, this is the only transportation that has shown considerable declines in its usages throughout the examined period. Although bus was the second most popular vehicle of UK commuters in 1970 with approximately 4 million commuters, this figure has dropped steadily and is forecasted to reach its lowest point in 2030
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-10 | chipchip99 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | chau hoang | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | chau hoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | xuongrongnho | view | |
| 2023-07-26 | xuongrongnho | 10 | view |
- The table below shows the production of cocoa beans in six regions between 1992 and 1998 tonnes 67
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- The charts compare the proportion of energy produced by different sources in France in 1995 and 2005 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, nonetheless, second, so, then, in contrast, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98522167488 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98731006955 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56157635468 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.4224187293 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.666666667 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8333333333 22.9334400587 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 5.23603664747 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272630600048 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13233710145 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967995934982 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191964361045 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701897377947 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.5 11.4329268293 249% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.