The best ways to solve world's environmental problems is increasing the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that the optimal measure to tackle environmental issues is the increase in fuel price. Although this may work to some extent, I would argue that there are more efficient ways to better the situation.
Raising the cost of fuel may lead to a decrease in the use of this energy in transportation and production. This means emissions, which are one of the main culprits of pollution, would be reduced, leading to improved air quality. For example, in Vietnam, the price of fuel has been so high that parts of its population have opted for other choices of communting, such as using shared cars or public means of transportation. As a result, the environmental situation in many big cities and various places seems to have improved. Therefore, charging people for a large sum of money for fuel might help deal with environmental issues, although this may not be the best solution.
However, the method stated above is not likely to solve such environmental problems, including deforestation. Authorities should launch campaigns encouraging people to preserve remained forests and to grow more plants. Another way to remedy the polluted environment is to raise citizens' awareness of the detrimental effects of pollution, therefore makes them adopt eco-friendly habits such as using paper bags instead of plastic bags. In addition, governments should spend parts of their budget on scientific researches because the results of these studies may be some innovative and efficient ways to address the issues mentioned above. It is also pivotal that local authorities impose strict laws and heavy punishments on any company or individual that contaminates their neighborhoods.
In conclusion, higher fuel cost might partly remedy the contaminated environment. However, more effective methods can be employed to address environmental problems, which threaten the quality of life of almost every nation in the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the number of visitors to four London museums Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 88
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of th 73
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010
- Studies have suggested that children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things What are the reasons and what measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or creativ 61
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37828947368 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00002705147 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615131578947 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2867907658 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.785714286 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170571119835 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578810436085 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466957159185 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108952612367 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364899622826 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.