The chart below shows the expenditure on three categories among different age group of residents in the UK in 2004. summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given column graph show the information about the different age group of UK residents to money spent on three basic items in 2004.
To begin with, 76+ group of people were expenditure on food and drink almost 23 % and an experienced the age groups of people were less money spent on this thing. After, this scenerio had been increased significantly in other three age groups.
Furthermore, around a fifth money was spent on household facility as restaurant and Hotel by under. The middle age groups spending money similarly. The 60-75 and the 76+ age groups Spent 2 percentage and 7 percentage respectively on restaurants and hotels.
Afterwards, under 30 and the 31-45 age groups residental were spending money noticeable on entertainment and suddenly this criteria increased enormous in the an experienced age groups. The entertainment show was very less popular among in older age group.
Overall, it is observed middle age of groups had been not interested for much money spent on three categories.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-19 | dhruv j patel | 61 | view |
- The restoration of old buildings in major cities around the world costs enormous amount of money This money would be better spent on providing new housing and road development To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- It has been of the date in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subject at University what do you think are the causes of the problem what are the effect on society 73
- The spread of multinational companies and the increase in globalisation produce positive effects for everyone Do you agree or disagree 56
- The chart shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the internet everyday from 2003 to 2006
- The pictures below show the differences in the layout of a conference Centre between its present and its future plan summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...basic items in 2004. To begin with, 76+ group of people were expenditure on food...
^^
Line 2, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...diture on food and drink almost 23 % and an experienced the age groups of people ...
^^
Line 2, column 165, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...le were less money spent on this thing. After, this scenerio had been increased signi...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 119, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...oticeable on entertainment and suddenly this criteria increased enormous in the an e...
^^^^
Line 4, column 155, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'an' is left.
Suggestion: the; an
...nly this criteria increased enormous in the an experienced age groups. The entertainme...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, similarly, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12121212121 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86514662389 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569696969697 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5772373621 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8888888889 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21216849132 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103418929845 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788798298949 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140335512903 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.08142455011 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.