The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000.
The line graph provides a breakdown on the birth rates of China and the USA over the period from 1920 to 2000.
A cursory glance at the diagram is enough to make it clear that the birth rates in China and the USA saw a significant decrease throughout the period shown.
According to the chart, China’s birth rate in 1920 was 10%. After that, this figure slightly increased to approximately 20% in 1935 then fall again to 10% in 1930. Following that, this number considerably rose to exactly 15% in 1935. However, this figure witnessed a substantial fall to 5% in 1940 then it levelled off at this point until 1945. Nonetheless, after this period, it sharply ascended and reached the highest point at 20% in 1950. Finally, this number rapidly declined to nearly 20% in 2000.
As can be seen from the diagram, the maternity rate in the USA and China had the same trend during the period from 1920 to 1930, both at about 10%. Nevertheless, this figure slightly fluctuated around 11% until 1940. Thereafter, there was a dramatic drop in the rate of birth in the USA to less than 5% in 1945. In addition, it experienced a rapid climb to 15% in 1950. Throughout the remainder of the period. This number fell gradually to nearly 7% in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-11 | thaiha123 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | teulimin.06 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | trucvy112233 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-04 | dhq.testbig | 78 | view |
- Some people think that books should be stopped in school and that videos films and computers should be used instead To what extent do you agree 84
- Nowadays parents are sending their children to trips abroad for educational purposes What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 61
- People live longer today and so people should stay in the workforce longer To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagram below shows the process of manufacturing ceramic pots 67
- The charts below show one government s spending on culture and education in 1995 and 2005 and the number of people participating in Arts events in the same year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wh 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, then, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59009009009 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52094947735 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522522522523 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4745543548 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.7857142857 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8571428571 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244412644034 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932413734226 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12424008625 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214166842036 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124523644475 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.2329268293 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.