The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
The line charts indicate the proportion of families using different electrical devices and how many hours a household did housework per week from 1920 and 2019.
It is clear that families have used modern devices more frequently through the years. Additionally, people spent less time doing housework during the research period.
Looking at the first line chart, in 1920 households in this nation did not use the refrigerator, while the percentage of families using washing machine was highest, at exactly 40%. At the same time, families cleaning their houses with vacuum cleaners accounted for 30%. Ninety years later, all families (100%) in the country used vacuum cleaners and refrigerators. By contrast, the figure for those owning washing machine rose slightly to approximately 75%, despite a slight decrease in between.
Starting with 50 hours per week, households spent around 35 hours doing housework per week in 1940 before falling dramatically to 20 hours. In addition, in 2019 the amount of time which every family cooked, cleaned, and washed dropped significantly to 10 hours a week.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-21 | steveminh | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | dodi1234 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | dodi1234 | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-22 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-21 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 84 | view |
- WRITING TASK 1 You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 78
- Whether or not someone achieve their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 73
- In some countries advertisers increase the amount of advertising which tries to persuade children to buy snacks toys and other goods Parents object to such pressure on children But some advertisers claim that there is useful information in these advertise 78
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35057471264 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69770506736 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683908045977 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9240255007 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.444444444 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21157565671 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829308821421 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627838456306 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132032453091 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384701570243 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.