Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In this progressive and sophisticated world, following regulations is the most important factor of governing various aspects of each society. A controversial question, which is often raised in this regard is that whether nowadays these regulations are very strict for young people to follow or not. While some people are inclined towards the idea that societies expect youngsters to obey strict laws and it is not fair for them, others, on the other hand, are against this idea. As far as I am concerned, I am of the opinion that the advantages of following strict rules for youngsters are immense and indisputable. I the following paragraph, I will delve into some reasons and examples justifying my point of view.
The first noteworthy reason coming to my mind is that by this approach young people will realize that all people including youngsters are equal before the law which makes them responsible people. Moreover, for preserving the discipline of society all people should follow the laws, otherwise, it gives rise to chaos. As a result, in this way, young people become aware of their responsibilities, and limitations for what they do. They realize that they do have not the right to benefit from extra freedom in comparison to the adult person. For instance, if they commit a less serious crime, they may receive light sentences such as doing community service or paying a fine.
Another exquisite point to be mentioned is that this attitude can protect the youth against many possible dangerous situations. Although young people reach some level of maturity, they are not still wise enough to avoid hazards. It is undeniable fact that youths are always thinking of how to enjoy their juvenile period most without considering the adverse effects of their behaviors and actions. Thus, this way can get them away from such circumstances. For example, driving at high speed gives them unlimited pleasure, and they tend to drive as fast as they can which may lead to serious injuries or even death. However, strict laws ban them from this hazardous behavior.
To summarize, from what has been discussed above, it is crystal clear that the merits of following strict laws by youths are myriad for them. The first merit is that this can protect them against various dangers. In addition, in this way, they can learn they will treat equally before the law, and they should watch their behavior and be responsible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-21 | slliland | 90 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-10 | sonyeoso | 90 | view |
| 2023-03-04 | saharmnd | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-25 | Chloe4112002 | 90 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. Use specific reasons and examples to support your 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. Use specific reasons and examples to support you 90
- Do you agree or disagree the following statement The more money a person has the more should he or she give away to charities 80
- TOP38Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- TPO6 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2022.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00495049505 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63160606015 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549504950495 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1982783386 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.421052632 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2631578947 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26315789474 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160943216958 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559524527201 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049249004051 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10620739313 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796731626282 0.0645574589148 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.