The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The illustration provides information about a change in population since 2000 and the prediction of a new figure in the future.
As it is observed over the 50 years period, India is going to experience an upward trend in its population and it will overtake China in the future. On the other hand, the population of China will peak in 2030 and see a decline after that. Getting to the details, in 2000, the proportion of people living in China more than in India. The number of China population is 1.25 billion while that of India just 1 billion. From 2000 to the present, citizens in these two nations substantially improve, rising 0.17 billion and reach over 1.4 billion in China. Over the same period, there have been 0.4 billion growth in the figure of India reaching nearly 1.4 billion
According to the graph presentation, say by the forecaster experts, the population in China and India will uplift at the same of 1.45 billion in 2030. After this, China may witness a gradual fall in the citizens to 1.4 billion in 2050, in contrast, that of India will probably go up and reach 1.6 billion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-04 | Lily Ha | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 10 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | bemoichoianhyeuem | view | |
| 2023-08-18 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | qaptpa | view |
- Convenience foods will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional foods methods of preparation To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- the diagram below shows the progress for recycling plastic bottles summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 84
- Some people think that parents should limit the time their children spend watching TV and playing computer games and encourage them to read books instead Do you agree or disagree with this point of view 78
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- some people think that social networking sites have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree or d agree 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64615384615 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54009271601 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1036721894 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.25 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243120679868 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120912358498 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522763241875 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188316199948 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380963720567 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.