Consider a situation where you are asked by your supervisor to work with one of your co-workers on a project. This co-worker has opinions that are very different from yours and they feel very strongly about these opinions. Do you think this is a good idea? Use reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is sometimes very challenging for people to work on a project with other people who have distinct opinions from us. In my opinion, I think it is a great notion to collaborate with a colleague which has a very distinct point of view from mine. I feel this way for the following reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, a co-worker with different opinions gives us new perspective to solve a problem, which we usually can not come up with. At work place people sometimes stuck in difficult tasks. This effects their productivity so, a co-worker helps at this point comes in handy. It makes our tasks more simple and easier. My own experiecne is a compelling example of this. Our manager told us to do a survey about pharmacutical quality assurance. I thought if we take the survey from huge multinational companies it would be eaiser. However, my partner suggested me to start survey from local companies because they have less work and their managers can easily facilitate us. I followed my partner advised and because of her we were able to complete our survey in few days. This would not have been possible if I did not accompany my colleague advise.
In addition, co-workers that has separate opinion increases our horizon of learning which means it provides us with more information. To exemplify, my boss gave me a project of email marketing with my colleague, who holds totally discrete point of view from mine. The tasks at first seems easy for me. I told my partner to make sheet at excel so that we can finish our work swiflty. However, my partner showed me, that we should use sendgrid software because it the simplest way of doing projects of email marketing. When I worked on the that software, it was better and most updated way to email marketing. It really upgraded me with new information and also I finished my task swiftly. Our boss appreciated us very much. This example elucidates that working with colleague who hold different opinions are a great help and improves our knowledge.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that it is a great notion to collaborate with a co-worker who has different opinion from us. This is because, it shows us new way to solve our problems and because it increases out knowledge.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-24 | Tina-Poorbaghi | 85 | view |
| 2021-08-05 | nida fatima | 60 | view |
| 2021-08-05 | ursula | 66 | view |
| 2021-03-26 | edsonsimoes | 66 | view |
| 2020-08-08 | GHAZAL100 | 85 | view |
- TPO 30 Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage 70
- A university plans to develop a new research center in your country Some people want a center for business research Other people want a center for research in agriculture farming Which of these two kinds of research centers do you recommend for your count 77
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement With the help of technology students nowadays can learn more information and learn it more quickly Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most serious problems in the world will be solved during my lifetime Use details and examples to support your answer 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, really, so, i feel, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 76.0 43.0788530466 176% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1871.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73670886076 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69548810883 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498734177215 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 22.0 9.59856630824 229% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8721217582 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.9583333333 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4583333333 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229733971323 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699718250971 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615401130883 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167131564442 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195842463973 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.