Some people think that the government should use extra money to fund programs to improve the environment. Others think that it is better for the government to spend money to support artistic programs. Which option do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is a long debate over that what are more crucial programs on which government should spend their extra money to develop it, either it should be artistic program or the enviromental programs. In my opinion, I personally believe that government should spend their money on the enviromental programs. In the following essy I intend to put forth my arguments to support my veiws.
To begin with, ecological development is very crucial for any state which means it need more attention to make it better. The enviroment has direct effect on an individual health and it is a serious matter of concern. The pollution free enviroment promotes better health not only to humans but also other surounding animals, plants and other living beings. So, in order to keep the ecosystem clean requires a lot of resources. Therefore, government should require to spend their extra funds in ecological improvement. To exemplify, recent research in our area has showed that childern have developed serious health issues like autism, gastrointestinal problems and infections. This is because the area had few industries nearby and the waste matters from these industries were not properly disposed off and resulted in severe pollution of water and air. This would not have happened if the city government support these industries by funding some extra money to develop a proper garbage disposal system. As a result, it is a significant source of concern that government should provide fund to improve the natural ecosystem.
In addition, the beauty of arts is not like by every person but clean enviroment system is admire by everyone. Also, when government take some measures to make the ecosystem clean, people then come forward to keep it clean. People more likely to enjoy natural, beautiful and tidy enviroment so they can relax and enjoy. However, there are many arts meusum in the city and few people accustomed to go there. For instance, in the Manhattan city Central Park is the biggest park in the city and it is a major spot for people and tourists attraction. This is because government has spent huge amount of money to make its ecosystem clean and neat. There are plentiful resources for people to relax, enjoy and soothe themselves. Most people from nearby areas usually go there to utilize their quality time, enjoy and admire the beauty of nature. Therefore, it is much better if the government spend more resources over environment development.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that to improve the environment is more important than art and therefore government should spend their funds over this program. This is because, ecological development is crucial for human health ,and because clean environment is admire and enjoy by every person.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-23 | Nina Tsarevich | 76 | view |
| 2021-08-07 | ChiuYuan | 70 | view |
| 2021-05-24 | ursula | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-13 | Pooja dave | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-29 | punam | 83 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to use printed materials such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The knowledge we gain from personal experiences is more valuable than the knowledge we gain from books Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Do not use memorized examples 60
- People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries 60
- When you face a difficult problem in life what do you feel is the best way to solve it asking someone with more experience for advice about the problem finding information about the problem using the Internet taking a long time to think about the problem 60
- Question The golden frog Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s to support my veiws. To begin with, ecological development is very crucial f...
^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...der to keep the ecosystem clean requires a lot of resources. Therefore, governme...
^^
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...requires a lot of resources. Therefore, government should require to spend their...
^^
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in ecological improvement. To exemplify, recent research in our area has showed t...
^^
Line 3, column 811, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tries were not properly disposed off and resulted in severe pollution of water an...
^^
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'admired'.
Suggestion: admired
...y person but clean enviroment system is admire by everyone. Also, when government take...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d their funds over this program. This is because, ecological development is cruc...
^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nds over this program. This is because, ecological development is crucial for hu...
^^
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... development is crucial for human health ,and because clean environment is admire ...
^^
Line 7, column 265, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'admired'.
Suggestion: admired
...ealth ,and because clean environment is admire and enjoy by every person.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.0752688172 322% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2305.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 450.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12222222222 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.706069082 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502222222222 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 736.2 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7306126687 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.217391304 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5652173913 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5652173913 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279086779061 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802807073923 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773769344872 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18126587455 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427229128786 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.