The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019
The pie charts compare four primary reasons for teenagers in one African nation using their phones from 2016 to 2019.
Overall, it is evident that using their phone on social networks was the most popular reason over the period shown, while the percentage of teenager phone users to make phone calls was the most minor.
In 2016, half of the number of teenagers used their cellphone on social networks, which doubled the figure for email, accounting for 25%. In 2017, the proportion of youngsters who used their phone on phone calls increased slightly to 13%, while the ratio of the digital camera remained unchanged at the first two years of the period, representing 15%.
Apart from declining to 48% in 2017, the percentage of phone users on social networks increased again to 51%. From 2018 to 2019, using phones on digital cameras became more popular, which made up 18 % of teenagers. In 2019, the lion's share was social networks, accounting for 56%, followed by the digital camera (20%) and email ( 19%). The figure for phone calls was just 5%.
- Some people say that schools should concentrate on teaching students academic subjects that will be useful for their future careers Other people say that subjects such as music and sports are also necessary Discuss both view and give your own opinion 73
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result people gravitate towards buying their products What problems does this cause What could be done to encourage people to buy local products 26
- Many children are encouraged by their parents to get a part time job in their free time What are the advantages and disadvantages to children of doing so Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 76
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 78
- Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future Others by contrast are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than huma 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...owed by the digital camera 20% and email 19%. The figure for phone calls was just...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86033519553 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28519118794 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569832402235 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9589681864 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.75 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317530052251 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155170936028 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125775547354 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241024949751 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130067357145 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.