Q8 As countries develop more and more people buy and use their own cars Do you think the advantages of this trend for individuals outweigh the disadvantages for the environment
Recently, whether an increase in the number of cars is beneficial has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that although there are some disadvantages to making use of cars for the environment, these are outweighed by the advantages for individual people, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I wholeheartedly agree with the former stance. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.
On the one hand, those who claim that a rise in the number of personal vehicles poses a threat to the environment do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that a huge amount of CO2 emitted by cars exerts a detrimental influence on the quality of air. In other words, excessive use of private vehicles leads to air pollution preventing human beings from having an improved standard of living. In addition, numerous endangered species of wildlife that should be protected in order to keep biodiversity can become extinct given that a large quantity of carbon dioxide accelerates the speed of global warming, which can even give rise to climate change.
My opinion, however, is that mankind can reap a myriad of advantages from the availability of personal vehicles. Perhaps the most compelling reason is that owning a car facilitates various aspects of people's daily life, from commuting to and from work to taking trips. To be more specific, employees are capable of travelling to their workplaces with greater ease since passengers of public transport often spend a great deal of time. This is because public transport systems are sometimes not only unavailable but also crowded. Furthermore, individuals' cars can minimise their inconvenience during their travel as tourists do not need to take into account problems related to public transport, such as being limited to fixed routes and timetables. In light of the above, I find these more persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that the benefits of using personal vehicles for humans surpass the drawbacks for the environment for the reasons discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-08 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-03 | hellielts | 89 | view |
| 2022-06-23 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | minhquanvn | 78 | view |
- Q10 Development in technology causes environmental problems Some people believe the solution to these problems is everyone accepts a simpler way of life while others say that technology can solve these problems Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Q 14 Some people think that success in life comes from hard work and determination while others think that there are more important factors such as money and appearance Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Q10 Development in technology causes environmental problems Some people believe the solution in these problems is everyone accepts a simpler way of life while others say that technology can solve these problems Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Q 13 The spread of multinational companies and the increase of globalization produces positive effects for everyone To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world Some people say that it is too late to do something while others think that actions can be taken to improve the situation Discuss both sides of the view and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that the bene...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20385674931 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85238794567 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625344352617 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4227742277 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0625 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6875 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271602759318 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690093241213 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709019721352 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15011541327 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042110438045 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.