Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, people’s opinions differ regarding whether to accept harsh circumstances. Some state that it would be easier to stay stable with whatever happens with us while I subscribe to the view that the best way to gain a better life is overcome these such conditions.
On the one hand, accepting difficult situations bring positive impacts for people in some cases. Once people normalize these such situations in some cases, they will reduce unnecessary pressures and feel more comfortable without putting in effort for things that are out of reach. The mute, for example, cannot change and improve their characteristics to be a good singer. Giving another reason, the success rate when people trying difficulties is unpredictable. It is undeniable that whether improvement can result in failure or not. These efforts, therefore, being risky and requiring many sacrifices such as property, money, and time.
On the other hand, I do believe that trying the best to overcome hardships would also be more beneficial for people. This is because those will gain greater opportunities from their improving durations. It is true that the worse circumstance people deal with, the more practical experiences they learn from. These life lessons, which, in turn, helping people realized their true abilities then enhancing them. Moreover, some even can go over the comfort zone and discover themselves. Taking Cervantes as an example. He did not only try to beat the bad conditions in the jail but he also found his literary talent, therefore, becoming a famous writer worldwide.
In conclusion, accepting bad reality is still a hot topic of debate in this today’s society. With these aforementioned ideas, I am convinced that people would gain a better life only they try to beat the unsatisfying circumstances.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-09 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
| 2024-01-23 | hau le | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 56 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 56 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal of more money than people in other important professions Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair Discuss both these views and give your opinion 80
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 78
- The pie charts above show the comparison of the proportion of energy produced by different sources in an European country in 1995 and 2005 80
- Some people say that public money should be used to support the work of theatre companies Others say that theatre companies should be completely self funding Discuss both these view and give your opinion 65
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in some cases, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28373702422 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88117922243 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636678200692 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.723268452 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8235294118 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94117647059 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29045660285 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760929972559 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439651077665 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162080838226 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494653775191 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.