some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe it is better for them to study alone. Discuss both views and give your opinions.
While some believe that group study is more beneficial for students, other people think that study on oneself is more efficient. I side with the latter view.
Studying in a group may benefit students in several ways. First, if a member of a study group does not understand the lessons clearly, he or she could require others for further explanations so that he or she could learn the materials thoroughly. Second, pupils in the same group could exchange information about their lessons. As a result, every member would be able to gain more insights into their projects, therefore, they could understand them clearly. Finally, group study helps students stay positive and motivated as members usually compliment each other on their achievements. For example, if one succeeded in solving a complicated maths problem, other members in his or her group would admire and praise this individual for his or her success.
On the other hand, I would argue that study alone would have more significant advantages for students. Learning in a group could be distracting for some students as members in the group may chat with each other rather than focus on their lessons. However, learning alone may provide students with the opportunity to eliminate almost every possible distraction such as people talking or phone notifications. For example, various pupils opt for studying on themselves in libraries because these places are usually quiet, which allows students to concentrate better on their learning. While students would have to follow a mutual method of learning if they studied in a group although these strategies may not be suitable for them; pupils could adopt their own learning strategy when they study alone. This means they would be more comfortable during studying hours, leading to their improvement in academic performance.
In my opinion, studying alone seems to have an edge over studying in a group, therefore, I would contend that it is more advantageous for students to study individually.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-09 | yenle | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-10 | kimtaeyeons | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-08 | Cynthia Nguyen | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-07 | phamhuyne | 67 | view |
| 2020-10-07 | phamhuyne | 80 | view |
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of children Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion 84
- The graph below shows information about the activities that Australian and New Zealand children enjoy doing most in 2007
- In recent years the structure of a family and the role of its members are gradually changing What kinds of changes can occur Do you think these changes are positive and negative 73
- Government investment in the arts such as music and theatre is a waste of money Governments must invest the money in public services instead To that extent do you agree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fro 67
- The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 642, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'maths'' or 'math's'?
Suggestion: maths'; math's
... one succeeded in solving a complicated maths problem, other members in his or her gr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20987654321 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71843329724 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524691358025 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7779549478 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.533333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.43618258896 0.244688304435 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164507553138 0.084324248473 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117914190145 0.0667982634062 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.33674397378 0.151304729494 223% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916650120382 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.