The tables show the number of research students in Australian universities in 2001 and 2010.
The given tables illustrate the number of national, local and the whole students average and the proportion of students in both genders, particularly in local and international students in Australian universities in 2001 and 2010.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there were upward trends in the number of students. Similarly, the table witnessed an upward trend in the percentage of international students; while the figure of local students bucked the trend.
In particular, in terms of the total number, the figure stood at nearly 39,000 research students in 2001, then increased sharply to around 54,000 students in 2001. Besides, there were about 34,000 local students, which was almost seven-fold higher than that of international students in 2001. Regarding the year 2010, the national students outnumbered international students by 8 to 3, with approximately 40,000 and 15,000 students respectively.
When it comes to the percentage of male and female local students, in 2001, the figure started at 87% in total, including 44% for men and 43% for women, followed by a slight fall of 14% in 2010, particularly with 38% and 35% correspondingly. Concerning international students, the graph experienced a double increase from 13% in 2001 to 27% in 2010, with 9%, 12% for male students and 4%, 15% for female counterparts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-01 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-11 | maiphuong0610 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Hoa Kim | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Hoa Kim | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Hoa Kim | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentages of both males and females who ate 5 kinds of fruits and vegetables per day in the UK in 2006 73
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying 78
- The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro 73
- The chart below shows the movement of people from rural to urban areas in three countries and predictions for future years 73
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people Do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, regarding, similarly, then, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28372093023 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06698252816 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553488372093 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3072841826 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345919305448 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155027071351 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114427514676 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21839105477 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129990546969 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.